- John F. Long reported a higher students per counselor than Bret R. Tarver (708:1 vs. 636:1).
- John F. Long reported a higher chronically absent students than Bret R. Tarver (284 vs. 234).
- John F. Long reported a higher in-school suspensions than Bret R. Tarver (30 vs. 11).
- Source Data Limit: 7 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
John F. Long reported a higher chronically absent students than Bret R. Tarver (284 vs. 234).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
Bret R. Tarver reported a higher gifted & talented than John F. Long (43 vs. 27).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
John F. Long reported a higher in-school suspensions than Bret R. Tarver (30 vs. 11).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
John F. Long reported a higher students per counselor than Bret R. Tarver (708:1 vs. 636:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
15 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
John F. Long
$11,949.17
Bret R. Tarver
$11,949.17
Local revenue share
John F. Long
14.8%
Bret R. Tarver
14.8%
State revenue share
John F. Long
52.9%
Bret R. Tarver
52.9%
Federal revenue share
John F. Long
32.3%
Bret R. Tarver
32.3%
District chronic absenteeism rate
John F. Long
44.2%
Bret R. Tarver
44.2%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Maricopa County
$85,518
Maricopa County
$85,518
Poverty rate
Maricopa County
11.3%
Maricopa County
11.3%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Maricopa County
35.9%
Maricopa County
35.9%
Unemployment rate
Maricopa County
3.1%
Maricopa County
3.1%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.