School DecisionSchoolDecision
School Comparison

Crescent Valley Public Charter II
vs.
Mt. Whitney High

A side-by-side view of publicly reported data for these two schools.

Crescent Valley Public Charter II
Mt. Whitney High
  • Mt. Whitney High reported a higher students per counselor than Crescent Valley Public Charter II (342.4:1 vs. 182.3:1).
  • Mt. Whitney High reported a higher graduating cohort than Crescent Valley Public Charter II (343 vs. 221).
  • Mt. Whitney High reported a higher chronically absent students than Crescent Valley Public Charter II (383 vs. 312).
  • Source Data Limit: 9 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
  • Source Data Limit: 3 additional metrics are reported by only one school.

Attendance

How consistently students are present

Mt. Whitney High reported a higher chronically absent students than Crescent Valley Public Charter II (383 vs. 312).

Graduation Outcomes

Cohort completion rates reported to federal agencies

Mt. Whitney High reported a higher graduating cohort than Crescent Valley Public Charter II (343 vs. 221).

Course Access & Programs

Advanced coursework and academic programs available

Mt. Whitney High reported a higher dual enrollment than Crescent Valley Public Charter II (51 vs. 12).

School Environment

Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection

Mt. Whitney High reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than Crescent Valley Public Charter II (51 vs. 0).

Staffing & Support

Counselor and support staff capacity

Mt. Whitney High reported a higher students per counselor than Crescent Valley Public Charter II (342.4:1 vs. 182.3:1).

Subgroup Analysis

Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.

29 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.

Reported Only at Mt. Whitney High

3 metrics were reported by Mt. Whitney High. Comparable data for Crescent Valley Public Charter II is missing or suppressed.

Graduation rate
94%
AP courses offered
11
AP enrollment
163

Contextual Indicators

District Context

District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.

Per-pupil spending
Crescent Valley Public Charter II
$20,369.53
Mt. Whitney High
$16,965.77
Local revenue share
Crescent Valley Public Charter II
1.7%
Mt. Whitney High
15.5%
State revenue share
Crescent Valley Public Charter II
96.2%
Mt. Whitney High
69.8%
Federal revenue share
Crescent Valley Public Charter II
2.1%
Mt. Whitney High
14.7%
District chronic absenteeism rate
Crescent Valley Public Charter II
47.1%
Mt. Whitney High
23.9%

County Economics

Both schools are located in the same county.

Median household income
Tulare County
$69,489
Tulare County
$69,489
Poverty rate
Tulare County
17.8%
Tulare County
17.8%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Tulare County
15.8%
Tulare County
15.8%
Unemployment rate
Tulare County
10.3%
Tulare County
10.3%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.