- North Tahoe reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than Creekside Charter (12 vs. 0).
- North Tahoe reported a higher in-school suspensions than Creekside Charter (9 vs. 0).
- North Tahoe reported a higher violent incidents than Creekside Charter (3 vs. 0).
- Source Data Limit: 4 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
- Source Data Limit: 3 additional metrics are reported by only one school.
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
North Tahoe reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than Creekside Charter (12 vs. 0).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
North Tahoe reported a higher counselors (full time employee) than Creekside Charter (1 vs. 0).
Reported Only at North Tahoe
3 metrics were reported by North Tahoe. Comparable data for Creekside Charter is missing or suppressed.
Chronically absent students
80
Gifted & talented
40
Students per counselor
321:1
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
Creekside Charter
$12,059.57
North Tahoe
$22,691.55
Local revenue share
Creekside Charter
16.5%
North Tahoe
64.9%
State revenue share
Creekside Charter
82%
North Tahoe
31.7%
Federal revenue share
Creekside Charter
1.6%
North Tahoe
3.4%
District chronic absenteeism rate
Creekside Charter
0%
North Tahoe
23%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Placer County
$114,678
Placer County
$114,678
Poverty rate
Placer County
6.7%
Placer County
6.7%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Placer County
42.9%
Placer County
42.9%
Unemployment rate
Placer County
4.1%
Placer County
4.1%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.