School DecisionSchoolDecision
School Comparison

Connecting Waters Charter - East Bay
vs.
Tom Kitayama Elementary

A side-by-side view of publicly reported data for these two schools.

Connecting Waters Charter - East Bay
Tom Kitayama Elementary
  • Tom Kitayama Elementary reported a higher chronically absent students than Connecting Waters Charter - East Bay (172 vs. 2).
  • Tom Kitayama Elementary reported a higher in-school suspensions than Connecting Waters Charter - East Bay (3 vs. 0).
  • Tom Kitayama Elementary reported a higher violent incidents than Connecting Waters Charter - East Bay (3 vs. 0).
  • Source Data Limit: 5 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
  • Source Data Limit: 4 additional metrics are reported by only one school.

Attendance

How consistently students are present

Tom Kitayama Elementary reported a higher chronically absent students than Connecting Waters Charter - East Bay (172 vs. 2).

School Environment

Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection

Tom Kitayama Elementary reported a higher in-school suspensions than Connecting Waters Charter - East Bay (3 vs. 0).

Staffing & Support

Counselor and support staff capacity

Connecting Waters Charter - East Bay reported a higher counselors (full time employee) than Tom Kitayama Elementary (0.64 vs. 0).

Subgroup Analysis

Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.

4 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.

Reported Only at Connecting Waters Charter - East Bay

4 metrics were reported by Connecting Waters Charter - East Bay. Comparable data for Tom Kitayama Elementary is missing or suppressed.

Graduating cohort
19
Dual enrollment
56
SAT/ACT participation
0
Students per counselor
775:1

Contextual Indicators

District Context

District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.

Per-pupil spending
Connecting Waters Charter - East Bay
$10,744.94
Tom Kitayama Elementary
$15,166.1
Local revenue share
Connecting Waters Charter - East Bay
33.1%
Tom Kitayama Elementary
38.8%
State revenue share
Connecting Waters Charter - East Bay
65.8%
Tom Kitayama Elementary
56.1%
Federal revenue share
Connecting Waters Charter - East Bay
1.1%
Tom Kitayama Elementary
5.1%
District chronic absenteeism rate
Connecting Waters Charter - East Bay
0.4%
Tom Kitayama Elementary
32.8%

County Economics

Both schools are located in the same county.

Median household income
Alameda County
$126,240
Alameda County
$126,240
Poverty rate
Alameda County
9.2%
Alameda County
9.2%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Alameda County
51.5%
Alameda County
51.5%
Unemployment rate
Alameda County
4.5%
Alameda County
4.5%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.