- Connecting Waters Charter reported a higher counselors (full time employee) than Hickman Charter (1.5 vs. 0).
- Source Data Limit: 1 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
- Source Data Limit: 6 additional metrics are reported by only one school.
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
Connecting Waters Charter reported a higher counselors (full time employee) than Hickman Charter (1.5 vs. 0).
Reported Only at Connecting Waters Charter
5 metrics were reported by Connecting Waters Charter. Comparable data for Hickman Charter is missing or suppressed.
Chronically absent students
20
Graduating cohort
132
Dual enrollment
78
SAT/ACT participation
0
Students per counselor
642.7:1
Reported Only at Hickman Charter
1 metric was reported by Hickman Charter. Comparable data for Connecting Waters Charter is missing or suppressed.
Gifted & talented
14
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
Connecting Waters Charter
$14,005.25
Hickman Charter
$-6,080,000
Local revenue share
Connecting Waters Charter
18.4%
Hickman Charter
9.6%
State revenue share
Connecting Waters Charter
81.3%
Hickman Charter
83.2%
Federal revenue share
Connecting Waters Charter
0.3%
Hickman Charter
7.1%
District chronic absenteeism rate
Connecting Waters Charter
2.6%
Hickman Charter
5.8%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Stanislaus County
$79,661
Stanislaus County
$79,661
Poverty rate
Stanislaus County
13.2%
Stanislaus County
13.2%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Stanislaus County
19.1%
Stanislaus County
19.1%
Unemployment rate
Stanislaus County
6.9%
Stanislaus County
6.9%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.