- Thomas R. Pollicita Middle reported a higher chronically absent students than Lipman Middle (149 vs. 22).
- Thomas R. Pollicita Middle reported a higher students per counselor than Lipman Middle (344:1 vs. 300:1).
- Thomas R. Pollicita Middle reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than Lipman Middle (5 vs. 1).
- Source Data Limit: 6 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
Thomas R. Pollicita Middle reported a higher chronically absent students than Lipman Middle (149 vs. 22).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
Thomas R. Pollicita Middle reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than Lipman Middle (5 vs. 1).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
Thomas R. Pollicita Middle reported a higher students per counselor than Lipman Middle (344:1 vs. 300:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
12 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
Lipman Middle
$26,019.78
Thomas R. Pollicita Middle
$16,792.17
Local revenue share
Lipman Middle
84.4%
Thomas R. Pollicita Middle
14.3%
State revenue share
Lipman Middle
13.3%
Thomas R. Pollicita Middle
77.7%
Federal revenue share
Lipman Middle
2.2%
Thomas R. Pollicita Middle
8%
District chronic absenteeism rate
Lipman Middle
19.6%
Thomas R. Pollicita Middle
24.2%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
San Mateo County
$156,000
San Mateo County
$156,000
Poverty rate
San Mateo County
6.5%
San Mateo County
6.5%
Bachelor's degree or higher
San Mateo County
53.1%
San Mateo County
53.1%
Unemployment rate
San Mateo County
3.6%
San Mateo County
3.6%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.