- Howard Tanner reported a higher students per counselor than Mark Keppel (479:1 vs. 423:1).
- Howard Tanner reported a higher chronically absent students than Mark Keppel (174 vs. 168).
- Mark Keppel reported a higher gifted & talented than Howard Tanner (49 vs. 44).
- Source Data Limit: 7 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
Howard Tanner reported a higher chronically absent students than Mark Keppel (174 vs. 168).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
Mark Keppel reported a higher gifted & talented than Howard Tanner (49 vs. 44).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
Mark Keppel reported a higher in-school suspensions than Howard Tanner (2 vs. 0).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
Howard Tanner reported a higher students per counselor than Mark Keppel (479:1 vs. 423:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
13 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
Mark Keppel
$21,267.24
Howard Tanner
$21,267.24
Local revenue share
Mark Keppel
18.4%
Howard Tanner
18.4%
State revenue share
Mark Keppel
69.6%
Howard Tanner
69.6%
Federal revenue share
Mark Keppel
12%
Howard Tanner
12%
District chronic absenteeism rate
Mark Keppel
33.3%
Howard Tanner
33.3%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Los Angeles County
$87,760
Los Angeles County
$87,760
Poverty rate
Los Angeles County
13.6%
Los Angeles County
13.6%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Los Angeles County
35.5%
Los Angeles County
35.5%
Unemployment rate
Los Angeles County
5.8%
Los Angeles County
5.8%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.