- Woodside Intermediate School reported a higher chronically absent students than MacDonough School (49 vs. 37).
- MacDonough School reported a higher gifted & talented than Woodside Intermediate School (14 vs. 7).
- Woodside Intermediate School reported a higher in-school suspensions than MacDonough School (10 vs. 5).
- Source Data Limit: 5 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
Woodside Intermediate School reported a higher chronically absent students than MacDonough School (49 vs. 37).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
MacDonough School reported a higher gifted & talented than Woodside Intermediate School (14 vs. 7).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
Woodside Intermediate School reported a higher in-school suspensions than MacDonough School (10 vs. 5).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
12 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
Woodside Intermediate School
$21,409.86
MacDonough School
$27,701.63
Local revenue share
Woodside Intermediate School
65.6%
MacDonough School
54.9%
State revenue share
Woodside Intermediate School
28.6%
MacDonough School
37%
Federal revenue share
Woodside Intermediate School
5.7%
MacDonough School
8.1%
District chronic absenteeism rate
Woodside Intermediate School
11.4%
MacDonough School
18.5%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region
$101,117
Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region
$101,117
Poverty rate
Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region
6.9%
Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region
6.9%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region
45.5%
Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region
45.5%
Unemployment rate
Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region
2.8%
Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region
2.8%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.