- Frank Ward Strong School reported a higher students per counselor than East Hampton Middle School (299:1 vs. 216:1).
- East Hampton Middle School reported a higher chronically absent students than Frank Ward Strong School (56 vs. 29).
- East Hampton Middle School reported a higher violent incidents than Frank Ward Strong School (8 vs. 0).
- Source Data Limit: 6 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
East Hampton Middle School reported a higher chronically absent students than Frank Ward Strong School (56 vs. 29).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
East Hampton Middle School reported a higher violent incidents than Frank Ward Strong School (8 vs. 0).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
Frank Ward Strong School reported a higher students per counselor than East Hampton Middle School (299:1 vs. 216:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
7 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
East Hampton Middle School
$24,303.39
Frank Ward Strong School
$31,139.93
Local revenue share
East Hampton Middle School
66.5%
Frank Ward Strong School
72.4%
State revenue share
East Hampton Middle School
29.7%
Frank Ward Strong School
24.8%
Federal revenue share
East Hampton Middle School
3.7%
Frank Ward Strong School
2.8%
District chronic absenteeism rate
East Hampton Middle School
12%
Frank Ward Strong School
10.6%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region
$101,117
Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region
$101,117
Poverty rate
Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region
6.9%
Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region
6.9%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region
45.5%
Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region
45.5%
Unemployment rate
Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region
2.8%
Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region
2.8%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.