School DecisionSchoolDecision
School Comparison

M. L. King Jr. Middle School
vs.
Classical Magnet School

A side-by-side view of publicly reported data for these two schools.

M. L. King Jr. Middle School
Classical Magnet School
  • M. L. King Jr. Middle School reported a higher students per counselor than Classical Magnet School (214:1 vs. 151.7:1).
  • Classical Magnet School reported a higher chronically absent students than M. L. King Jr. Middle School (106 vs. 73).
  • M. L. King Jr. Middle School reported a higher in-school suspensions than Classical Magnet School (58 vs. 35).
  • Source Data Limit: 5 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
  • Source Data Limit: 2 additional metrics are reported by only one school.

Attendance

How consistently students are present

Classical Magnet School reported a higher chronically absent students than M. L. King Jr. Middle School (106 vs. 73).

School Environment

Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection

M. L. King Jr. Middle School reported a higher in-school suspensions than Classical Magnet School (58 vs. 35).

Staffing & Support

Counselor and support staff capacity

M. L. King Jr. Middle School reported a higher students per counselor than Classical Magnet School (214:1 vs. 151.7:1).

Subgroup Analysis

Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.

14 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.

Reported Only at Classical Magnet School

2 metrics were reported by Classical Magnet School. Comparable data for M. L. King Jr. Middle School is missing or suppressed.

Graduating cohort
48
SAT/ACT participation
52

Contextual Indicators

District Context

District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.

Per-pupil spending
M. L. King Jr. Middle School
$26,328.66
Classical Magnet School
$26,328.66
Local revenue share
M. L. King Jr. Middle School
25.9%
Classical Magnet School
25.9%
State revenue share
M. L. King Jr. Middle School
64.8%
Classical Magnet School
64.8%
Federal revenue share
M. L. King Jr. Middle School
9.3%
Classical Magnet School
9.3%
District chronic absenteeism rate
M. L. King Jr. Middle School
37.7%
Classical Magnet School
37.7%

County Economics

Both schools are located in the same county.

Median household income
Capitol Planning Region
$91,541
Capitol Planning Region
$91,541
Poverty rate
Capitol Planning Region
10.3%
Capitol Planning Region
10.3%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Capitol Planning Region
41.5%
Capitol Planning Region
41.5%
Unemployment rate
Capitol Planning Region
3.2%
Capitol Planning Region
3.2%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.