- Casimir Pulaski School reported a higher chronically absent students than Roger Sherman School (120 vs. 102).
- Casimir Pulaski School reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than Roger Sherman School (12 vs. 4).
- Casimir Pulaski School reported a higher in-school suspensions than Roger Sherman School (5 vs. 0).
- Source Data Limit: 4 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
Casimir Pulaski School reported a higher chronically absent students than Roger Sherman School (120 vs. 102).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
Casimir Pulaski School reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than Roger Sherman School (12 vs. 4).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
13 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
Casimir Pulaski School
$19,611.47
Roger Sherman School
$19,611.47
Local revenue share
Casimir Pulaski School
30.5%
Roger Sherman School
30.5%
State revenue share
Casimir Pulaski School
54.2%
Roger Sherman School
54.2%
Federal revenue share
Casimir Pulaski School
15.4%
Roger Sherman School
15.4%
District chronic absenteeism rate
Casimir Pulaski School
25.2%
Roger Sherman School
25.2%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
South Central Connecticut Planning Region
$86,266
South Central Connecticut Planning Region
$86,266
Poverty rate
South Central Connecticut Planning Region
11.6%
South Central Connecticut Planning Region
11.6%
Bachelor's degree or higher
South Central Connecticut Planning Region
41.1%
South Central Connecticut Planning Region
41.1%
Unemployment rate
South Central Connecticut Planning Region
3.2%
South Central Connecticut Planning Region
3.2%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.