- Thomas Hooker School reported a higher chronically absent students than Mary G. Fritz Elementary School of Yalesville (66 vs. 33).
- Mary G. Fritz Elementary School of Yalesville reported a higher violent incidents than Thomas Hooker School (10 vs. 0).
- Mary G. Fritz Elementary School of Yalesville reported a higher in-school suspensions than Thomas Hooker School (3 vs. 0).
- Source Data Limit: 5 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
- Source Data Limit: 2 additional metrics are reported by only one school.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
Thomas Hooker School reported a higher chronically absent students than Mary G. Fritz Elementary School of Yalesville (66 vs. 33).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
Mary G. Fritz Elementary School of Yalesville reported a higher violent incidents than Thomas Hooker School (10 vs. 0).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
Thomas Hooker School reported a higher counselors (full time employee) than Mary G. Fritz Elementary School of Yalesville (1 vs. 0).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
10 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Reported Only at Thomas Hooker School
1 metric was reported by Thomas Hooker School. Comparable data for Mary G. Fritz Elementary School of Yalesville is missing or suppressed.
Students per counselor
346:1
Reported Only at Mary G. Fritz Elementary School of Yalesville
1 metric was reported by Mary G. Fritz Elementary School of Yalesville. Comparable data for Thomas Hooker School is missing or suppressed.
Gifted & talented
15
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
Thomas Hooker School
$19,611.47
Mary G. Fritz Elementary School of Yalesville
$25,568.88
Local revenue share
Thomas Hooker School
30.5%
Mary G. Fritz Elementary School of Yalesville
64.9%
State revenue share
Thomas Hooker School
54.2%
Mary G. Fritz Elementary School of Yalesville
29.9%
Federal revenue share
Thomas Hooker School
15.4%
Mary G. Fritz Elementary School of Yalesville
5.3%
District chronic absenteeism rate
Thomas Hooker School
25.2%
Mary G. Fritz Elementary School of Yalesville
16.5%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
South Central Connecticut Planning Region
$86,266
South Central Connecticut Planning Region
$86,266
Poverty rate
South Central Connecticut Planning Region
11.6%
South Central Connecticut Planning Region
11.6%
Bachelor's degree or higher
South Central Connecticut Planning Region
41.1%
South Central Connecticut Planning Region
41.1%
Unemployment rate
South Central Connecticut Planning Region
3.2%
South Central Connecticut Planning Region
3.2%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.