School DecisionSchoolDecision
School Comparison

Frank Ward Strong School
vs.
Haddam-Killingworth Middle School

A side-by-side view of publicly reported data for these two schools.

Frank Ward Strong School
Haddam-Killingworth Middle School
  • Frank Ward Strong School reported a higher students per counselor than Haddam-Killingworth Middle School (299:1 vs. 197.5:1).
  • Haddam-Killingworth Middle School reported a higher in-school suspensions than Frank Ward Strong School (15 vs. 1).
  • Haddam-Killingworth Middle School reported a higher chronically absent students than Frank Ward Strong School (32 vs. 29).
  • Source Data Limit: 5 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.

Attendance

How consistently students are present

Haddam-Killingworth Middle School reported a higher chronically absent students than Frank Ward Strong School (32 vs. 29).

School Environment

Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection

Haddam-Killingworth Middle School reported a higher in-school suspensions than Frank Ward Strong School (15 vs. 1).

Staffing & Support

Counselor and support staff capacity

Frank Ward Strong School reported a higher students per counselor than Haddam-Killingworth Middle School (299:1 vs. 197.5:1).

Subgroup Analysis

Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.

7 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.

Contextual Indicators

District Context

District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.

Per-pupil spending
Frank Ward Strong School
$31,139.93
Haddam-Killingworth Middle School
$25,889.2
Local revenue share
Frank Ward Strong School
72.4%
Haddam-Killingworth Middle School
74.6%
State revenue share
Frank Ward Strong School
24.8%
Haddam-Killingworth Middle School
22%
Federal revenue share
Frank Ward Strong School
2.8%
Haddam-Killingworth Middle School
3.3%
District chronic absenteeism rate
Frank Ward Strong School
10.6%
Haddam-Killingworth Middle School
12.5%

County Economics

Both schools are located in the same county.

Median household income
Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region
$101,117
Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region
$101,117
Poverty rate
Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region
6.9%
Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region
6.9%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region
45.5%
Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region
45.5%
Unemployment rate
Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region
2.8%
Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region
2.8%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.