- Latimer Lane School reported a higher chronically absent students than Tootin' Hills School (40 vs. 37).
- Tootin' Hills School reported a higher in-school suspensions than Latimer Lane School (3 vs. 0).
- Source Data Limit: 2 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
Latimer Lane School reported a higher chronically absent students than Tootin' Hills School (40 vs. 37).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
Tootin' Hills School reported a higher in-school suspensions than Latimer Lane School (3 vs. 0).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
11 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
Latimer Lane School
$23,454.3
Tootin' Hills School
$23,454.3
Local revenue share
Latimer Lane School
78.1%
Tootin' Hills School
78.1%
State revenue share
Latimer Lane School
19.6%
Tootin' Hills School
19.6%
Federal revenue share
Latimer Lane School
2.2%
Tootin' Hills School
2.2%
District chronic absenteeism rate
Latimer Lane School
11.9%
Tootin' Hills School
11.9%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Capitol Planning Region
$91,541
Capitol Planning Region
$91,541
Poverty rate
Capitol Planning Region
10.3%
Capitol Planning Region
10.3%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Capitol Planning Region
41.5%
Capitol Planning Region
41.5%
Unemployment rate
Capitol Planning Region
3.2%
Capitol Planning Region
3.2%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.