- B. W. Tinker School reported a higher students per counselor than Gilmartin School (541:1 vs. 474:1).
- B. W. Tinker School reported a higher chronically absent students than Gilmartin School (161 vs. 120).
- Gilmartin School reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than B. W. Tinker School (12 vs. 6).
- Source Data Limit: 5 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
B. W. Tinker School reported a higher chronically absent students than Gilmartin School (161 vs. 120).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
Gilmartin School reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than B. W. Tinker School (12 vs. 6).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
B. W. Tinker School reported a higher students per counselor than Gilmartin School (541:1 vs. 474:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
13 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
B. W. Tinker School
$20,128.71
Gilmartin School
$20,128.71
Local revenue share
B. W. Tinker School
25.2%
Gilmartin School
25.2%
State revenue share
B. W. Tinker School
59.1%
Gilmartin School
59.1%
Federal revenue share
B. W. Tinker School
15.7%
Gilmartin School
15.7%
District chronic absenteeism rate
B. W. Tinker School
30.4%
Gilmartin School
30.4%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Naugatuck Valley Planning Region
$86,365
Naugatuck Valley Planning Region
$86,365
Poverty rate
Naugatuck Valley Planning Region
10.3%
Naugatuck Valley Planning Region
10.3%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Naugatuck Valley Planning Region
33.8%
Naugatuck Valley Planning Region
33.8%
Unemployment rate
Naugatuck Valley Planning Region
3.6%
Naugatuck Valley Planning Region
3.6%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.