- Fuller Meadow reported a higher students per counselor than John E Burke (180:1 vs. 157.8:1).
- John E Burke reported a higher chronically absent students than Fuller Meadow (41 vs. 34).
- Fuller Meadow reported a higher counselors (full time employee) than John E Burke (1.6 vs. 1.54).
- Source Data Limit: 3 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
John E Burke reported a higher chronically absent students than Fuller Meadow (41 vs. 34).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
Fuller Meadow reported a higher students per counselor than John E Burke (180:1 vs. 157.8:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
12 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
Fuller Meadow
$23,157.24
John E Burke
$19,014.24
Local revenue share
Fuller Meadow
34.1%
John E Burke
47.2%
State revenue share
Fuller Meadow
54.8%
John E Burke
43.2%
Federal revenue share
Fuller Meadow
11.1%
John E Burke
9.6%
District chronic absenteeism rate
Fuller Meadow
10.9%
John E Burke
24.5%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Essex County
$99,431
Essex County
$99,431
Poverty rate
Essex County
9.4%
Essex County
9.4%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Essex County
42.3%
Essex County
42.3%
Unemployment rate
Essex County
4.1%
Essex County
4.1%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.