- Leeds reported a higher students per counselor than Anne T. Dunphy School (215.2:1 vs. 128:1).
- Leeds reported a higher chronically absent students than Anne T. Dunphy School (43 vs. 25).
- Leeds reported a higher counselors (full time employee) than Anne T. Dunphy School (1.25 vs. 1).
- Source Data Limit: 3 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
Leeds reported a higher chronically absent students than Anne T. Dunphy School (43 vs. 25).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
Leeds reported a higher students per counselor than Anne T. Dunphy School (215.2:1 vs. 128:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
9 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
Leeds
$21,537.39
Anne T. Dunphy School
$24,299.21
Local revenue share
Leeds
64.7%
Anne T. Dunphy School
6.3%
State revenue share
Leeds
27.3%
Anne T. Dunphy School
92%
Federal revenue share
Leeds
7.9%
Anne T. Dunphy School
1.8%
District chronic absenteeism rate
Leeds
20.8%
Anne T. Dunphy School
21.4%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Hampshire County
$86,391
Hampshire County
$86,391
Poverty rate
Hampshire County
10.9%
Hampshire County
10.9%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Hampshire County
51.1%
Hampshire County
51.1%
Unemployment rate
Hampshire County
3.8%
Hampshire County
3.8%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.