- Elm Park Community reported a higher students per counselor than City View (199:1 vs. 119.4:1).
- Elm Park Community reported a higher chronically absent students than City View (146 vs. 128).
- City View reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than Elm Park Community (12 vs. 4).
- Source Data Limit: 6 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
Elm Park Community reported a higher chronically absent students than City View (146 vs. 128).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
City View reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than Elm Park Community (12 vs. 4).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
Elm Park Community reported a higher students per counselor than City View (199:1 vs. 119.4:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
17 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
Elm Park Community
$22,197.68
City View
$22,197.68
Local revenue share
Elm Park Community
14.8%
City View
14.8%
State revenue share
Elm Park Community
65.1%
City View
65.1%
Federal revenue share
Elm Park Community
20%
City View
20%
District chronic absenteeism rate
Elm Park Community
27%
City View
27%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Worcester County
$93,561
Worcester County
$93,561
Poverty rate
Worcester County
10.3%
Worcester County
10.3%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Worcester County
39%
Worcester County
39%
Unemployment rate
Worcester County
4.1%
Worcester County
4.1%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.