Eaton County Youth Facility vs Maple Valley Jr/Sr High School

Maple Valley Jr/Sr High School reported a higher chronically absent students than Eaton County Youth Facility (132 vs. 23).
Maple Valley Jr/Sr High School reported a higher sat/act participation than Eaton County Youth Facility (73 vs. 0).
Maple Valley Jr/Sr High School reported a higher graduating cohort than Eaton County Youth Facility (57 vs. 3).
Source Data Limit: 6 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Source Data Limit: 5 additional metrics are reported by only one school.

Attendance

How consistently students are present

Maple Valley Jr/Sr High School reported a higher chronically absent students than Eaton County Youth Facility (132 vs. 23).

Cohort completion rates reported to federal agencies

Maple Valley Jr/Sr High School reported a higher graduating cohort than Eaton County Youth Facility (57 vs. 3).

Advanced coursework and academic programs available

Maple Valley Jr/Sr High School reported a higher sat/act participation than Eaton County Youth Facility (73 vs. 0).

Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection

Maple Valley Jr/Sr High School reported a higher violent incidents than Eaton County Youth Facility (22 vs. 0).

Counselor and support staff capacity

Maple Valley Jr/Sr High School reported a higher counselors (full time employee) than Eaton County Youth Facility (1 vs. 0).

Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.

17 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.

5 metrics were reported by Maple Valley Jr/Sr High School. Comparable data for Eaton County Youth Facility is missing or suppressed.

AP courses offered

AP enrollment

Dual enrollment

In-school suspensions

Students per counselor

371:1

District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.

Per-pupil spending

Eaton County Youth Facility

$13,400.12