- NEW PRAGUE SENIOR HIGH reported a higher sat/act participation than SW Metro JAF (254 vs. 0).
- NEW PRAGUE SENIOR HIGH reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than SW Metro JAF (10 vs. 0).
- NEW PRAGUE SENIOR HIGH reported a higher counselors (full time employee) than SW Metro JAF (4 vs. 0).
- Source Data Limit: 4 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
- Source Data Limit: 7 additional metrics are reported by only one school.
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
NEW PRAGUE SENIOR HIGH reported a higher sat/act participation than SW Metro JAF (254 vs. 0).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
NEW PRAGUE SENIOR HIGH reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than SW Metro JAF (10 vs. 0).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
NEW PRAGUE SENIOR HIGH reported a higher counselors (full time employee) than SW Metro JAF (4 vs. 0).
Reported Only at NEW PRAGUE SENIOR HIGH
7 metrics were reported by NEW PRAGUE SENIOR HIGH. Comparable data for SW Metro JAF is missing or suppressed.
Chronically absent students
231
Graduation rate
96%
Graduating cohort
287
AP courses offered
8
AP enrollment
112
Gifted & talented
57
Students per counselor
337:1
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
SW Metro JAF
$-9,014,000
NEW PRAGUE SENIOR HIGH
$12,225.52
Local revenue share
SW Metro JAF
28.7%
NEW PRAGUE SENIOR HIGH
32.7%
State revenue share
SW Metro JAF
66.7%
NEW PRAGUE SENIOR HIGH
62.7%
Federal revenue share
SW Metro JAF
4.6%
NEW PRAGUE SENIOR HIGH
4.6%
District chronic absenteeism rate
SW Metro JAF
100%
NEW PRAGUE SENIOR HIGH
16.8%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Scott County
$120,247
Scott County
$120,247
Poverty rate
Scott County
4.1%
Scott County
4.1%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Scott County
43.1%
Scott County
43.1%
Unemployment rate
Scott County
2.7%
Scott County
2.7%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.