HINCKLEY-FINLAYSON SECONDARY vs PINE CITY AREA LEARNING CENTER

HINCKLEY-FINLAYSON SECONDARY reported a higher violent incidents than PINE CITY AREA LEARNING CENTER (37 vs. 0).
HINCKLEY-FINLAYSON SECONDARY reported a higher graduating cohort than PINE CITY AREA LEARNING CENTER (53 vs. 24).
HINCKLEY-FINLAYSON SECONDARY reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than PINE CITY AREA LEARNING CENTER (25 vs. 0).
Source Data Limit: 6 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Source Data Limit: 3 additional metrics are reported by only one school.

Graduation Outcomes

Cohort completion rates reported to federal agencies

HINCKLEY-FINLAYSON SECONDARY reported a higher graduating cohort than PINE CITY AREA LEARNING CENTER (53 vs. 24).

Advanced coursework and academic programs available

HINCKLEY-FINLAYSON SECONDARY reported a higher sat/act participation than PINE CITY AREA LEARNING CENTER (23 vs. 0).

Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection

HINCKLEY-FINLAYSON SECONDARY reported a higher violent incidents than PINE CITY AREA LEARNING CENTER (37 vs. 0).

Counselor and support staff capacity

HINCKLEY-FINLAYSON SECONDARY reported a higher counselors (full time employee) than PINE CITY AREA LEARNING CENTER (1 vs. 0).

Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.

7 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.

3 metrics were reported by HINCKLEY-FINLAYSON SECONDARY. Comparable data for PINE CITY AREA LEARNING CENTER is missing or suppressed.

Chronically absent students

189

Dual enrollment

Students per counselor

475:1

District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.

Per-pupil spending

HINCKLEY-FINLAYSON SECONDARY

$14,815.84