FALLS SECONDARY vs LITTLEFORK-BIG FALLS SECONDARY

FALLS SECONDARY reported a higher students per counselor than LITTLEFORK-BIG FALLS SECONDARY (516:1 vs. 197:1).
FALLS SECONDARY reported a higher graduating cohort than LITTLEFORK-BIG FALLS SECONDARY (72 vs. 23).
FALLS SECONDARY reported a higher in-school suspensions than LITTLEFORK-BIG FALLS SECONDARY (53 vs. 7).
Source Data Limit: 8 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Source Data Limit: 1 additional metric is reported by only one school.

Attendance

How consistently students are present

FALLS SECONDARY reported a higher chronically absent students than LITTLEFORK-BIG FALLS SECONDARY (52 vs. 35).

Cohort completion rates reported to federal agencies

FALLS SECONDARY reported a higher graduating cohort than LITTLEFORK-BIG FALLS SECONDARY (72 vs. 23).

Advanced coursework and academic programs available

LITTLEFORK-BIG FALLS SECONDARY reported a higher dual enrollment than FALLS SECONDARY (25 vs. 0).

Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection

FALLS SECONDARY reported a higher in-school suspensions than LITTLEFORK-BIG FALLS SECONDARY (53 vs. 7).

Counselor and support staff capacity

FALLS SECONDARY reported a higher students per counselor than LITTLEFORK-BIG FALLS SECONDARY (516:1 vs. 197:1).

Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.

11 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.

1 metric was reported by LITTLEFORK-BIG FALLS SECONDARY. Comparable data for FALLS SECONDARY is missing or suppressed.

Gifted & talented

District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.

Per-pupil spending

FALLS SECONDARY

$15,309.84