- GRAND RIVER TECHNICAL SCH. reported a higher students per counselor than CHILLICOTHE HIGH (679:1 vs. 247.6:1).
- CHILLICOTHE HIGH reported a higher in-school suspensions than GRAND RIVER TECHNICAL SCH. (85 vs. 3).
- CHILLICOTHE HIGH reported a higher dual enrollment than GRAND RIVER TECHNICAL SCH. (82 vs. 5).
- Source Data Limit: 7 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
- Source Data Limit: 2 additional metrics are reported by only one school.
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
CHILLICOTHE HIGH reported a higher dual enrollment than GRAND RIVER TECHNICAL SCH. (82 vs. 5).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
CHILLICOTHE HIGH reported a higher in-school suspensions than GRAND RIVER TECHNICAL SCH. (85 vs. 3).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
GRAND RIVER TECHNICAL SCH. reported a higher students per counselor than CHILLICOTHE HIGH (679:1 vs. 247.6:1).
Reported Only at CHILLICOTHE HIGH
2 metrics were reported by CHILLICOTHE HIGH. Comparable data for GRAND RIVER TECHNICAL SCH. is missing or suppressed.
Chronically absent students
72
Graduating cohort
133
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
GRAND RIVER TECHNICAL SCH.
$11,445.55
CHILLICOTHE HIGH
$11,445.55
Local revenue share
GRAND RIVER TECHNICAL SCH.
54.8%
CHILLICOTHE HIGH
54.8%
State revenue share
GRAND RIVER TECHNICAL SCH.
31.1%
CHILLICOTHE HIGH
31.1%
Federal revenue share
GRAND RIVER TECHNICAL SCH.
14.1%
CHILLICOTHE HIGH
14.1%
District chronic absenteeism rate
GRAND RIVER TECHNICAL SCH.
8.7%
CHILLICOTHE HIGH
8.7%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Livingston County
$60,148
Livingston County
$60,148
Poverty rate
Livingston County
12.2%
Livingston County
12.2%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Livingston County
18.3%
Livingston County
18.3%
Unemployment rate
Livingston County
3.4%
Livingston County
3.4%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.