Lake Lure Classical Academy vs Rutherfordton Elementary School

Rutherfordton Elementary School reported a higher students per counselor than Lake Lure Classical Academy (364:1 vs. 168:1).
Lake Lure Classical Academy reported a higher gifted & talented than Rutherfordton Elementary School (52 vs. 22).
Lake Lure Classical Academy reported a higher in-school suspensions than Rutherfordton Elementary School (14 vs. 0).
Source Data Limit: 7 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Source Data Limit: 3 additional metrics are reported by only one school.

Attendance

How consistently students are present

Lake Lure Classical Academy reported a higher chronically absent students than Rutherfordton Elementary School (113 vs. 106).

Advanced coursework and academic programs available

Lake Lure Classical Academy reported a higher gifted & talented than Rutherfordton Elementary School (52 vs. 22).

Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection

Lake Lure Classical Academy reported a higher in-school suspensions than Rutherfordton Elementary School (14 vs. 0).

Counselor and support staff capacity

Rutherfordton Elementary School reported a higher students per counselor than Lake Lure Classical Academy (364:1 vs. 168:1).

Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.

12 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.

3 metrics were reported by Lake Lure Classical Academy. Comparable data for Rutherfordton Elementary School is missing or suppressed.

Graduating cohort

Dual enrollment

SAT/ACT participation

District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.

Per-pupil spending

Lake Lure Classical Academy

$12,807.69