Global E-Learning Academy vs Surry Early College High School of Design

Surry Early College High School of Design reported a higher dual enrollment than Global E-Learning Academy (293 vs. 3).
Surry Early College High School of Design reported a higher students per counselor than Global E-Learning Academy (397.3:1 vs. 130:1).
Surry Early College High School of Design reported a higher sat/act participation than Global E-Learning Academy (73 vs. 3).
Source Data Limit: 8 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Source Data Limit: 1 additional metric is reported by only one school.

Attendance

How consistently students are present

Surry Early College High School of Design reported a higher chronically absent students than Global E-Learning Academy (11 vs. 2).

Advanced coursework and academic programs available

Surry Early College High School of Design reported a higher dual enrollment than Global E-Learning Academy (293 vs. 3).

Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection

Global E-Learning Academy reported a higher in-school suspensions than Surry Early College High School of Design (1 vs. 0).

Counselor and support staff capacity

Surry Early College High School of Design reported a higher students per counselor than Global E-Learning Academy (397.3:1 vs. 130:1).

Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.

1 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.

1 metric was reported by Surry Early College High School of Design. Comparable data for Global E-Learning Academy is missing or suppressed.

Graduating cohort

District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.

Per-pupil spending

Global E-Learning Academy

$13,670.7