Harding University High School vs Phillip O. Berry Academy of Technology

Harding University High School reported a higher chronically absent students than Phillip O. Berry Academy of Technology (689 vs. 228).
Phillip O. Berry Academy of Technology reported a higher ap enrollment than Harding University High School (459 vs. 183).
Phillip O. Berry Academy of Technology reported a higher sat/act participation than Harding University High School (370 vs. 245).
Source Data Limit: 13 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Source Data Limit: 1 additional metric is reported by only one school.

Attendance

How consistently students are present

Harding University High School reported a higher chronically absent students than Phillip O. Berry Academy of Technology (689 vs. 228).

Cohort completion rates reported to federal agencies

Phillip O. Berry Academy of Technology reported a higher graduation rate than Harding University High School (95% vs. 65%).

Advanced coursework and academic programs available

Phillip O. Berry Academy of Technology reported a higher ap enrollment than Harding University High School (459 vs. 183).

Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection

Harding University High School reported a higher in-school suspensions than Phillip O. Berry Academy of Technology (140 vs. 40).

Counselor and support staff capacity

Phillip O. Berry Academy of Technology reported a higher students per counselor than Harding University High School (288.3:1 vs. 274.5:1).

Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.

28 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.

1 metric was reported by Harding University High School. Comparable data for Phillip O. Berry Academy of Technology is missing or suppressed.

IB enrollment

District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.

Per-pupil spending

Harding University High School

$12,198.37