Performance Learning Center vs Military and Global Leadership

Military and Global Leadership reported a higher students per counselor than Performance Learning Center (186:1 vs. 73:1).
Military and Global Leadership reported a higher chronically absent students than Performance Learning Center (64 vs. 33).
Military and Global Leadership reported a higher ap enrollment than Performance Learning Center (22 vs. 2).
Source Data Limit: 11 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Source Data Limit: 1 additional metric is reported by only one school.

Attendance

How consistently students are present

Military and Global Leadership reported a higher chronically absent students than Performance Learning Center (64 vs. 33).

Cohort completion rates reported to federal agencies

Performance Learning Center reported a higher graduating cohort than Military and Global Leadership (47 vs. 30).

Advanced coursework and academic programs available

Military and Global Leadership reported a higher ap enrollment than Performance Learning Center (22 vs. 2).

Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection

Military and Global Leadership reported a higher in-school suspensions than Performance Learning Center (10 vs. 7).

Counselor and support staff capacity

Military and Global Leadership reported a higher students per counselor than Performance Learning Center (186:1 vs. 73:1).

Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.

18 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.

1 metric was reported by Military and Global Leadership. Comparable data for Performance Learning Center is missing or suppressed.

Gifted & talented

District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.

Per-pupil spending

Performance Learning Center

$12,198.37