- Mitchell Andrew ES reported a higher students per counselor than Dooley John ES (331:1 vs. 310:1).
- Dooley John ES reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than Mitchell Andrew ES (5 vs. 0).
- Dooley John ES reported a higher violent incidents than Mitchell Andrew ES (6 vs. 1).
- Source Data Limit: 6 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
- Source Data Limit: 1 additional metric is reported by only one school.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
Dooley John ES reported a higher chronically absent students than Mitchell Andrew ES (103 vs. 100).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
Dooley John ES reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than Mitchell Andrew ES (5 vs. 0).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
Mitchell Andrew ES reported a higher students per counselor than Dooley John ES (331:1 vs. 310:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
14 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Reported Only at Dooley John ES
1 metric was reported by Dooley John ES. Comparable data for Mitchell Andrew ES is missing or suppressed.
Gifted & talented
10
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
Mitchell Andrew ES
$11,569.23
Dooley John ES
$11,569.23
Local revenue share
Mitchell Andrew ES
17.1%
Dooley John ES
17.1%
State revenue share
Mitchell Andrew ES
65.9%
Dooley John ES
65.9%
Federal revenue share
Mitchell Andrew ES
17%
Dooley John ES
17%
District chronic absenteeism rate
Mitchell Andrew ES
42.8%
Dooley John ES
42.8%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Clark County
$73,845
Clark County
$73,845
Poverty rate
Clark County
13.2%
Clark County
13.2%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Clark County
27.3%
Clark County
27.3%
Unemployment rate
Clark County
5.8%
Clark County
5.8%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.