- Roberts Aggie ES reported a higher chronically absent students than Cox David M ES (174 vs. 121).
- Cox David M ES reported a higher gifted & talented than Roberts Aggie ES (44 vs. 13).
- Roberts Aggie ES reported a higher in-school suspensions than Cox David M ES (18 vs. 4).
- Source Data Limit: 7 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
Roberts Aggie ES reported a higher chronically absent students than Cox David M ES (174 vs. 121).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
Cox David M ES reported a higher gifted & talented than Roberts Aggie ES (44 vs. 13).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
Roberts Aggie ES reported a higher in-school suspensions than Cox David M ES (18 vs. 4).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
Cox David M ES reported a higher students per counselor than Roberts Aggie ES (491:1 vs. 483:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
19 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
Cox David M ES
$11,569.23
Roberts Aggie ES
$11,569.23
Local revenue share
Cox David M ES
17.1%
Roberts Aggie ES
17.1%
State revenue share
Cox David M ES
65.9%
Roberts Aggie ES
65.9%
Federal revenue share
Cox David M ES
17%
Roberts Aggie ES
17%
District chronic absenteeism rate
Cox David M ES
42.8%
Roberts Aggie ES
42.8%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Clark County
$73,845
Clark County
$73,845
Poverty rate
Clark County
13.2%
Clark County
13.2%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Clark County
27.3%
Clark County
27.3%
Unemployment rate
Clark County
5.8%
Clark County
5.8%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.