- Taylor Glen C ES reported a higher students per counselor than Vanderburg John ES (685:1 vs. 578:1).
- Taylor Glen C ES reported a higher chronically absent students than Vanderburg John ES (189 vs. 84).
- Vanderburg John ES reported a higher gifted & talented than Taylor Glen C ES (74 vs. 61).
- Source Data Limit: 7 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
Taylor Glen C ES reported a higher chronically absent students than Vanderburg John ES (189 vs. 84).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
Vanderburg John ES reported a higher gifted & talented than Taylor Glen C ES (74 vs. 61).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
Taylor Glen C ES reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than Vanderburg John ES (11 vs. 0).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
Taylor Glen C ES reported a higher students per counselor than Vanderburg John ES (685:1 vs. 578:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
16 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
Vanderburg John ES
$11,569.23
Taylor Glen C ES
$11,569.23
Local revenue share
Vanderburg John ES
17.1%
Taylor Glen C ES
17.1%
State revenue share
Vanderburg John ES
65.9%
Taylor Glen C ES
65.9%
Federal revenue share
Vanderburg John ES
17%
Taylor Glen C ES
17%
District chronic absenteeism rate
Vanderburg John ES
42.8%
Taylor Glen C ES
42.8%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Clark County
$73,845
Clark County
$73,845
Poverty rate
Clark County
13.2%
Clark County
13.2%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Clark County
27.3%
Clark County
27.3%
Unemployment rate
Clark County
5.8%
Clark County
5.8%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.