- Thompson Sandra L ES reported a higher students per counselor than Divich Kenneth ES (574:1 vs. 451:1).
- Divich Kenneth ES reported a higher gifted & talented than Thompson Sandra L ES (78 vs. 23).
- Thompson Sandra L ES reported a higher violent incidents than Divich Kenneth ES (17 vs. 6).
- Source Data Limit: 7 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
Divich Kenneth ES reported a higher chronically absent students than Thompson Sandra L ES (209 vs. 199).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
Divich Kenneth ES reported a higher gifted & talented than Thompson Sandra L ES (78 vs. 23).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
Thompson Sandra L ES reported a higher violent incidents than Divich Kenneth ES (17 vs. 6).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
Thompson Sandra L ES reported a higher students per counselor than Divich Kenneth ES (574:1 vs. 451:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
17 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
Thompson Sandra L ES
$11,569.23
Divich Kenneth ES
$11,569.23
Local revenue share
Thompson Sandra L ES
17.1%
Divich Kenneth ES
17.1%
State revenue share
Thompson Sandra L ES
65.9%
Divich Kenneth ES
65.9%
Federal revenue share
Thompson Sandra L ES
17%
Divich Kenneth ES
17%
District chronic absenteeism rate
Thompson Sandra L ES
42.8%
Divich Kenneth ES
42.8%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Clark County
$73,845
Clark County
$73,845
Poverty rate
Clark County
13.2%
Clark County
13.2%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Clark County
27.3%
Clark County
27.3%
Unemployment rate
Clark County
5.8%
Clark County
5.8%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.