- THOMAS ES reported a higher students per counselor than BURCHAM ES (712.1:1 vs. 510:1).
- BURCHAM ES reported a higher chronically absent students than THOMAS ES (82 vs. 21).
- BURCHAM ES reported a higher counselors (full time employee) than THOMAS ES (1 vs. 0.33).
- Source Data Limit: 3 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
- Source Data Limit: 1 additional metric is reported by only one school.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
BURCHAM ES reported a higher chronically absent students than THOMAS ES (82 vs. 21).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
THOMAS ES reported a higher students per counselor than BURCHAM ES (712.1:1 vs. 510:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
9 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Reported Only at THOMAS ES
1 metric was reported by THOMAS ES. Comparable data for BURCHAM ES is missing or suppressed.
Gifted & talented
10
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
THOMAS ES
$15,959.14
BURCHAM ES
$9,674.2
Local revenue share
THOMAS ES
77%
BURCHAM ES
51.3%
State revenue share
THOMAS ES
16.6%
BURCHAM ES
37.9%
Federal revenue share
THOMAS ES
6.5%
BURCHAM ES
10.8%
District chronic absenteeism rate
THOMAS ES
7.7%
BURCHAM ES
18.7%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Custer County
$57,562
Custer County
$57,562
Poverty rate
Custer County
16.5%
Custer County
16.5%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Custer County
33.3%
Custer County
33.3%
Unemployment rate
Custer County
2.9%
Custer County
2.9%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.