School DecisionSchoolDecision
School Comparison

ARROWHEAD ES
vs.
PETERS ES

A side-by-side view of publicly reported data for these two schools.

ARROWHEAD ES
PETERS ES
  • PETERS ES reported a higher gifted & talented than ARROWHEAD ES (49 vs. 20).
  • ARROWHEAD ES reported a higher students per counselor than PETERS ES (425:1 vs. 396:1).
  • ARROWHEAD ES reported a higher chronically absent students than PETERS ES (79 vs. 58).
  • Source Data Limit: 7 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.

Attendance

How consistently students are present

ARROWHEAD ES reported a higher chronically absent students than PETERS ES (79 vs. 58).

Course Access & Programs

Advanced coursework and academic programs available

PETERS ES reported a higher gifted & talented than ARROWHEAD ES (49 vs. 20).

School Environment

Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection

ARROWHEAD ES reported a higher in-school suspensions than PETERS ES (16 vs. 9).

Staffing & Support

Counselor and support staff capacity

ARROWHEAD ES reported a higher students per counselor than PETERS ES (425:1 vs. 396:1).

Subgroup Analysis

Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.

15 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.

Contextual Indicators

District Context

District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.

Per-pupil spending
ARROWHEAD ES
$8,776.78
PETERS ES
$11,333.98
Local revenue share
ARROWHEAD ES
46.7%
PETERS ES
50%
State revenue share
ARROWHEAD ES
44%
PETERS ES
36.1%
Federal revenue share
ARROWHEAD ES
9.3%
PETERS ES
13.9%
District chronic absenteeism rate
ARROWHEAD ES
25.5%
PETERS ES
31.2%

County Economics

Both schools are located in the same county.

Median household income
Tulsa County
$67,317
Tulsa County
$67,317
Poverty rate
Tulsa County
14.7%
Tulsa County
14.7%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Tulsa County
33.7%
Tulsa County
33.7%
Unemployment rate
Tulsa County
3.3%
Tulsa County
3.3%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.