- NICOMA PARK MS reported a higher gifted & talented than CARL ALBERT MS (373 vs. 210).
- CARL ALBERT MS reported a higher in-school suspensions than NICOMA PARK MS (180 vs. 98).
- CARL ALBERT MS reported a higher violent incidents than NICOMA PARK MS (79 vs. 8).
- Source Data Limit: 7 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
CARL ALBERT MS reported a higher chronically absent students than NICOMA PARK MS (225 vs. 161).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
NICOMA PARK MS reported a higher gifted & talented than CARL ALBERT MS (373 vs. 210).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
CARL ALBERT MS reported a higher in-school suspensions than NICOMA PARK MS (180 vs. 98).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
CARL ALBERT MS reported a higher students per counselor than NICOMA PARK MS (397:1 vs. 338.5:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
16 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
NICOMA PARK MS
$8,587
CARL ALBERT MS
$10,269.63
Local revenue share
NICOMA PARK MS
44%
CARL ALBERT MS
35.8%
State revenue share
NICOMA PARK MS
48.2%
CARL ALBERT MS
45%
Federal revenue share
NICOMA PARK MS
7.8%
CARL ALBERT MS
19.3%
District chronic absenteeism rate
NICOMA PARK MS
29.9%
CARL ALBERT MS
38.7%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Oklahoma County
$65,374
Oklahoma County
$65,374
Poverty rate
Oklahoma County
15.7%
Oklahoma County
15.7%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Oklahoma County
35.1%
Oklahoma County
35.1%
Unemployment rate
Oklahoma County
3.2%
Oklahoma County
3.2%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.