- CHOCTAW MS reported a higher gifted & talented than CARL ALBERT MS (404 vs. 210).
- CARL ALBERT MS reported a higher in-school suspensions than CHOCTAW MS (180 vs. 64).
- CARL ALBERT MS reported a higher students per counselor than CHOCTAW MS (397:1 vs. 313.5:1).
- Source Data Limit: 7 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
CHOCTAW MS reported a higher chronically absent students than CARL ALBERT MS (227 vs. 225).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
CHOCTAW MS reported a higher gifted & talented than CARL ALBERT MS (404 vs. 210).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
CARL ALBERT MS reported a higher in-school suspensions than CHOCTAW MS (180 vs. 64).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
CARL ALBERT MS reported a higher students per counselor than CHOCTAW MS (397:1 vs. 313.5:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
17 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
CHOCTAW MS
$8,587
CARL ALBERT MS
$10,269.63
Local revenue share
CHOCTAW MS
44%
CARL ALBERT MS
35.8%
State revenue share
CHOCTAW MS
48.2%
CARL ALBERT MS
45%
Federal revenue share
CHOCTAW MS
7.8%
CARL ALBERT MS
19.3%
District chronic absenteeism rate
CHOCTAW MS
29.9%
CARL ALBERT MS
38.7%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Oklahoma County
$65,374
Oklahoma County
$65,374
Poverty rate
Oklahoma County
15.7%
Oklahoma County
15.7%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Oklahoma County
35.1%
Oklahoma County
35.1%
Unemployment rate
Oklahoma County
3.2%
Oklahoma County
3.2%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.