- SILO ES reported a higher students per counselor than WASHINGTON IRVING ES (1735.7:1 vs. 468.3:1).
- WASHINGTON IRVING ES reported a higher chronically absent students than SILO ES (81 vs. 48).
- SILO ES reported a higher in-school suspensions than WASHINGTON IRVING ES (22 vs. 1).
- Source Data Limit: 6 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
- Source Data Limit: 1 additional metric is reported by only one school.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
WASHINGTON IRVING ES reported a higher chronically absent students than SILO ES (81 vs. 48).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
SILO ES reported a higher in-school suspensions than WASHINGTON IRVING ES (22 vs. 1).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
SILO ES reported a higher students per counselor than WASHINGTON IRVING ES (1735.7:1 vs. 468.3:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
12 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Reported Only at WASHINGTON IRVING ES
1 metric was reported by WASHINGTON IRVING ES. Comparable data for SILO ES is missing or suppressed.
Gifted & talented
11
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
WASHINGTON IRVING ES
$10,062.79
SILO ES
$10,551.43
Local revenue share
WASHINGTON IRVING ES
32%
SILO ES
37.1%
State revenue share
WASHINGTON IRVING ES
50.3%
SILO ES
48.7%
Federal revenue share
WASHINGTON IRVING ES
17.8%
SILO ES
14.3%
District chronic absenteeism rate
WASHINGTON IRVING ES
19.2%
SILO ES
17.3%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Bryan County
$54,280
Bryan County
$54,280
Poverty rate
Bryan County
17.4%
Bryan County
17.4%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Bryan County
24.4%
Bryan County
24.4%
Unemployment rate
Bryan County
3.1%
Bryan County
3.1%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.