- ANGIE DEBO ES reported a higher students per counselor than CHARLES HASKELL ES (410:1 vs. 264.8:1).
- ANGIE DEBO ES reported a higher gifted & talented than CHARLES HASKELL ES (71 vs. 41).
- CHARLES HASKELL ES reported a higher chronically absent students than ANGIE DEBO ES (121 vs. 99).
- Source Data Limit: 7 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
CHARLES HASKELL ES reported a higher chronically absent students than ANGIE DEBO ES (121 vs. 99).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
ANGIE DEBO ES reported a higher gifted & talented than CHARLES HASKELL ES (71 vs. 41).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
ANGIE DEBO ES reported a higher in-school suspensions than CHARLES HASKELL ES (13 vs. 0).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
ANGIE DEBO ES reported a higher students per counselor than CHARLES HASKELL ES (410:1 vs. 264.8:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
17 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
ANGIE DEBO ES
$9,438.72
CHARLES HASKELL ES
$9,438.72
Local revenue share
ANGIE DEBO ES
60.4%
CHARLES HASKELL ES
60.4%
State revenue share
ANGIE DEBO ES
29.7%
CHARLES HASKELL ES
29.7%
Federal revenue share
ANGIE DEBO ES
9.9%
CHARLES HASKELL ES
9.9%
District chronic absenteeism rate
ANGIE DEBO ES
15.6%
CHARLES HASKELL ES
15.6%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Oklahoma County
$65,374
Oklahoma County
$65,374
Poverty rate
Oklahoma County
15.7%
Oklahoma County
15.7%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Oklahoma County
35.1%
Oklahoma County
35.1%
Unemployment rate
Oklahoma County
3.2%
Oklahoma County
3.2%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.