- HAYES ES reported a higher students per counselor than MCKINLEY ES (512:1 vs. 508:1).
- MCKINLEY ES reported a higher chronically absent students than HAYES ES (60 vs. 58).
- Source Data Limit: 3 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
- Source Data Limit: 1 additional metric is reported by only one school.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
MCKINLEY ES reported a higher chronically absent students than HAYES ES (60 vs. 58).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
HAYES ES reported a higher students per counselor than MCKINLEY ES (512:1 vs. 508:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
15 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Reported Only at HAYES ES
1 metric was reported by HAYES ES. Comparable data for MCKINLEY ES is missing or suppressed.
Gifted & talented
18
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
HAYES ES
$9,917.86
MCKINLEY ES
$9,917.86
Local revenue share
HAYES ES
32.7%
MCKINLEY ES
32.7%
State revenue share
HAYES ES
51.5%
MCKINLEY ES
51.5%
Federal revenue share
HAYES ES
15.8%
MCKINLEY ES
15.8%
District chronic absenteeism rate
HAYES ES
21.5%
MCKINLEY ES
21.5%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Garfield County
$67,302
Garfield County
$67,302
Poverty rate
Garfield County
12.7%
Garfield County
12.7%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Garfield County
22.3%
Garfield County
22.3%
Unemployment rate
Garfield County
3.3%
Garfield County
3.3%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.