- VIRGINIA SMITH ES reported a higher chronically absent students than LUTHER ES (59 vs. 8).
- VIRGINIA SMITH ES reported a higher violent incidents than LUTHER ES (12 vs. 0).
- VIRGINIA SMITH ES reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than LUTHER ES (4 vs. 1).
- Source Data Limit: 4 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
- Source Data Limit: 2 additional metrics are reported by only one school.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
VIRGINIA SMITH ES reported a higher chronically absent students than LUTHER ES (59 vs. 8).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
VIRGINIA SMITH ES reported a higher violent incidents than LUTHER ES (12 vs. 0).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
LUTHER ES reported a higher counselors (full time employee) than VIRGINIA SMITH ES (0.5 vs. 0).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
6 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Reported Only at LUTHER ES
2 metrics were reported by LUTHER ES. Comparable data for VIRGINIA SMITH ES is missing or suppressed.
Gifted & talented
10
Students per counselor
672:1
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
VIRGINIA SMITH ES
$8,319.58
LUTHER ES
$11,861.48
Local revenue share
VIRGINIA SMITH ES
38.3%
LUTHER ES
62.8%
State revenue share
VIRGINIA SMITH ES
46.4%
LUTHER ES
18.9%
Federal revenue share
VIRGINIA SMITH ES
15.3%
LUTHER ES
18.3%
District chronic absenteeism rate
VIRGINIA SMITH ES
21.9%
LUTHER ES
11.9%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Oklahoma County
$65,374
Oklahoma County
$65,374
Poverty rate
Oklahoma County
15.7%
Oklahoma County
15.7%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Oklahoma County
35.1%
Oklahoma County
35.1%
Unemployment rate
Oklahoma County
3.2%
Oklahoma County
3.2%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.