- M.L. KING JR. ES reported a higher students per counselor than PLEASANT HILL EC CTR (348:1 vs. 165:1).
- M.L. KING JR. ES reported a higher chronically absent students than PLEASANT HILL EC CTR (188 vs. 39).
- PLEASANT HILL EC CTR reported a higher gifted & talented than M.L. KING JR. ES (9 vs. 1).
- Source Data Limit: 7 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
M.L. KING JR. ES reported a higher chronically absent students than PLEASANT HILL EC CTR (188 vs. 39).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
PLEASANT HILL EC CTR reported a higher gifted & talented than M.L. KING JR. ES (9 vs. 1).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
PLEASANT HILL EC CTR reported a higher violent incidents than M.L. KING JR. ES (7 vs. 0).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
M.L. KING JR. ES reported a higher students per counselor than PLEASANT HILL EC CTR (348:1 vs. 165:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
15 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
PLEASANT HILL EC CTR
$10,269.63
M.L. KING JR. ES
$13,335.15
Local revenue share
PLEASANT HILL EC CTR
35.8%
M.L. KING JR. ES
38.3%
State revenue share
PLEASANT HILL EC CTR
45%
M.L. KING JR. ES
35.8%
Federal revenue share
PLEASANT HILL EC CTR
19.3%
M.L. KING JR. ES
25.9%
District chronic absenteeism rate
PLEASANT HILL EC CTR
38.7%
M.L. KING JR. ES
48.5%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Oklahoma County
$65,374
Oklahoma County
$65,374
Poverty rate
Oklahoma County
15.7%
Oklahoma County
15.7%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Oklahoma County
35.1%
Oklahoma County
35.1%
Unemployment rate
Oklahoma County
3.2%
Oklahoma County
3.2%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.