- JOHN GLENN ES reported a higher students per counselor than ARTHUR ES (495.4:1 vs. 333:1).
- JOHN GLENN ES reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than ARTHUR ES (25 vs. 0).
- JOHN GLENN ES reported a higher chronically absent students than ARTHUR ES (139 vs. 124).
- Source Data Limit: 6 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
JOHN GLENN ES reported a higher chronically absent students than ARTHUR ES (139 vs. 124).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
JOHN GLENN ES reported a higher gifted & talented than ARTHUR ES (18 vs. 4).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
JOHN GLENN ES reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than ARTHUR ES (25 vs. 0).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
JOHN GLENN ES reported a higher students per counselor than ARTHUR ES (495.4:1 vs. 333:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
16 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
ARTHUR ES
$13,335.15
JOHN GLENN ES
$13,887.33
Local revenue share
ARTHUR ES
38.3%
JOHN GLENN ES
61.6%
State revenue share
ARTHUR ES
35.8%
JOHN GLENN ES
15%
Federal revenue share
ARTHUR ES
25.9%
JOHN GLENN ES
23.4%
District chronic absenteeism rate
ARTHUR ES
48.5%
JOHN GLENN ES
49.8%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Oklahoma County
$65,374
Oklahoma County
$65,374
Poverty rate
Oklahoma County
15.7%
Oklahoma County
15.7%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Oklahoma County
35.1%
Oklahoma County
35.1%
Unemployment rate
Oklahoma County
3.2%
Oklahoma County
3.2%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.