School DecisionSchoolDecision
School Comparison

ATOR ES
vs.
LARKIN BAILEY ES

A side-by-side view of publicly reported data for these two schools.

ATOR ES
LARKIN BAILEY ES
  • ATOR ES reported a higher chronically absent students than LARKIN BAILEY ES (105 vs. 56).
  • LARKIN BAILEY ES reported a higher gifted & talented than ATOR ES (14 vs. 2).
  • LARKIN BAILEY ES reported a higher students per counselor than ATOR ES (423:1 vs. 414:1).
  • Source Data Limit: 6 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.

Attendance

How consistently students are present

ATOR ES reported a higher chronically absent students than LARKIN BAILEY ES (105 vs. 56).

Course Access & Programs

Advanced coursework and academic programs available

LARKIN BAILEY ES reported a higher gifted & talented than ATOR ES (14 vs. 2).

School Environment

Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection

ATOR ES reported a higher in-school suspensions than LARKIN BAILEY ES (5 vs. 0).

Staffing & Support

Counselor and support staff capacity

LARKIN BAILEY ES reported a higher students per counselor than ATOR ES (423:1 vs. 414:1).

Subgroup Analysis

Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.

15 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.

Contextual Indicators

District Context

District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.

Per-pupil spending
ATOR ES
$9,408.9
LARKIN BAILEY ES
$9,408.9
Local revenue share
ATOR ES
53.9%
LARKIN BAILEY ES
53.9%
State revenue share
ATOR ES
37.5%
LARKIN BAILEY ES
37.5%
Federal revenue share
ATOR ES
8.5%
LARKIN BAILEY ES
8.5%
District chronic absenteeism rate
ATOR ES
18.5%
LARKIN BAILEY ES
18.5%

County Economics

Both schools are located in the same county.

Median household income
Tulsa County
$67,317
Tulsa County
$67,317
Poverty rate
Tulsa County
14.7%
Tulsa County
14.7%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Tulsa County
33.7%
Tulsa County
33.7%
Unemployment rate
Tulsa County
3.3%
Tulsa County
3.3%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.