- LARKIN BAILEY ES reported a higher students per counselor than HAYWARD SMITH ES (423:1 vs. 390.9:1).
- HAYWARD SMITH ES reported a higher chronically absent students than LARKIN BAILEY ES (76 vs. 56).
- LARKIN BAILEY ES reported a higher gifted & talented than HAYWARD SMITH ES (14 vs. 7).
- Source Data Limit: 6 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
HAYWARD SMITH ES reported a higher chronically absent students than LARKIN BAILEY ES (76 vs. 56).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
LARKIN BAILEY ES reported a higher gifted & talented than HAYWARD SMITH ES (14 vs. 7).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
HAYWARD SMITH ES reported a higher out-of-school suspensions than LARKIN BAILEY ES (6 vs. 1).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
LARKIN BAILEY ES reported a higher students per counselor than HAYWARD SMITH ES (423:1 vs. 390.9:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
15 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
LARKIN BAILEY ES
$9,408.9
HAYWARD SMITH ES
$9,408.9
Local revenue share
LARKIN BAILEY ES
53.9%
HAYWARD SMITH ES
53.9%
State revenue share
LARKIN BAILEY ES
37.5%
HAYWARD SMITH ES
37.5%
Federal revenue share
LARKIN BAILEY ES
8.5%
HAYWARD SMITH ES
8.5%
District chronic absenteeism rate
LARKIN BAILEY ES
18.5%
HAYWARD SMITH ES
18.5%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Tulsa County
$67,317
Tulsa County
$67,317
Poverty rate
Tulsa County
14.7%
Tulsa County
14.7%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Tulsa County
33.7%
Tulsa County
33.7%
Unemployment rate
Tulsa County
3.3%
Tulsa County
3.3%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.