School DecisionSchoolDecision
School Comparison

PRUE ES
vs.
CENTRAL MS

A side-by-side view of publicly reported data for these two schools.

PRUE ES
CENTRAL MS
  • PRUE ES reported a higher students per counselor than CENTRAL MS (347.9:1 vs. 102.4:1).
  • CENTRAL MS reported a higher chronically absent students than PRUE ES (270 vs. 53).
  • CENTRAL MS reported a higher in-school suspensions than PRUE ES (127 vs. 0).
  • Source Data Limit: 7 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.

Attendance

How consistently students are present

CENTRAL MS reported a higher chronically absent students than PRUE ES (270 vs. 53).

Course Access & Programs

Advanced coursework and academic programs available

CENTRAL MS reported a higher gifted & talented than PRUE ES (19 vs. 7).

School Environment

Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection

CENTRAL MS reported a higher in-school suspensions than PRUE ES (127 vs. 0).

Staffing & Support

Counselor and support staff capacity

PRUE ES reported a higher students per counselor than CENTRAL MS (347.9:1 vs. 102.4:1).

Subgroup Analysis

Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.

11 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.

Contextual Indicators

District Context

District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.

Per-pupil spending
PRUE ES
$10,589.23
CENTRAL MS
$11,872.78
Local revenue share
PRUE ES
39.6%
CENTRAL MS
49.4%
State revenue share
PRUE ES
38.6%
CENTRAL MS
29.1%
Federal revenue share
PRUE ES
21.9%
CENTRAL MS
21.5%
District chronic absenteeism rate
PRUE ES
22.8%
CENTRAL MS
56.5%

County Economics

Both schools are located in the same county.

Median household income
Osage County
$60,482
Osage County
$60,482
Poverty rate
Osage County
12.6%
Osage County
12.6%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Osage County
21.5%
Osage County
21.5%
Unemployment rate
Osage County
3.9%
Osage County
3.9%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.