- GARFIELD ES reported a higher students per counselor than PRATT ES (466:1 vs. 351:1).
- GARFIELD ES reported a higher chronically absent students than PRATT ES (171 vs. 70).
- PRATT ES reported a higher gifted & talented than GARFIELD ES (16 vs. 2).
- Source Data Limit: 4 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
GARFIELD ES reported a higher chronically absent students than PRATT ES (171 vs. 70).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
PRATT ES reported a higher gifted & talented than GARFIELD ES (16 vs. 2).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
GARFIELD ES reported a higher students per counselor than PRATT ES (466:1 vs. 351:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
15 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
GARFIELD ES
$10,241.6
PRATT ES
$10,241.6
Local revenue share
GARFIELD ES
31.7%
PRATT ES
31.7%
State revenue share
GARFIELD ES
51.9%
PRATT ES
51.9%
Federal revenue share
GARFIELD ES
16.4%
PRATT ES
16.4%
District chronic absenteeism rate
GARFIELD ES
12%
PRATT ES
12%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Tulsa County
$67,317
Tulsa County
$67,317
Poverty rate
Tulsa County
14.7%
Tulsa County
14.7%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Tulsa County
33.7%
Tulsa County
33.7%
Unemployment rate
Tulsa County
3.3%
Tulsa County
3.3%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.