- DANIEL WEBSTER MS reported a higher chronically absent students than CLYDE BOYD MS (310 vs. 83).
- CLYDE BOYD MS reported a higher gifted & talented than DANIEL WEBSTER MS (86 vs. 31).
- CLYDE BOYD MS reported a higher students per counselor than DANIEL WEBSTER MS (366:1 vs. 320:1).
- Source Data Limit: 7 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
DANIEL WEBSTER MS reported a higher chronically absent students than CLYDE BOYD MS (310 vs. 83).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
CLYDE BOYD MS reported a higher gifted & talented than DANIEL WEBSTER MS (86 vs. 31).
School Environment
Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection
CLYDE BOYD MS reported a higher violent incidents than DANIEL WEBSTER MS (30 vs. 0).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
CLYDE BOYD MS reported a higher students per counselor than DANIEL WEBSTER MS (366:1 vs. 320:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
15 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
CLYDE BOYD MS
$10,241.6
DANIEL WEBSTER MS
$11,872.78
Local revenue share
CLYDE BOYD MS
31.7%
DANIEL WEBSTER MS
49.4%
State revenue share
CLYDE BOYD MS
51.9%
DANIEL WEBSTER MS
29.1%
Federal revenue share
CLYDE BOYD MS
16.4%
DANIEL WEBSTER MS
21.5%
District chronic absenteeism rate
CLYDE BOYD MS
12%
DANIEL WEBSTER MS
56.5%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Tulsa County
$67,317
Tulsa County
$67,317
Poverty rate
Tulsa County
14.7%
Tulsa County
14.7%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Tulsa County
33.7%
Tulsa County
33.7%
Unemployment rate
Tulsa County
3.3%
Tulsa County
3.3%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.