School DecisionSchoolDecision
School Comparison

SPERRY MS
vs.
CARVER MS

A side-by-side view of publicly reported data for these two schools.

SPERRY MS
CARVER MS
  • CARVER MS reported a higher gifted & talented than SPERRY MS (278 vs. 38).
  • CARVER MS reported a higher students per counselor than SPERRY MS (311.5:1 vs. 89.8:1).
  • CARVER MS reported a higher in-school suspensions than SPERRY MS (86 vs. 0).
  • Source Data Limit: 7 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.

Attendance

How consistently students are present

SPERRY MS reported a higher chronically absent students than CARVER MS (78 vs. 74).

Course Access & Programs

Advanced coursework and academic programs available

CARVER MS reported a higher gifted & talented than SPERRY MS (278 vs. 38).

School Environment

Disciplinary actions from the Civil Rights Data Collection

CARVER MS reported a higher in-school suspensions than SPERRY MS (86 vs. 0).

Staffing & Support

Counselor and support staff capacity

CARVER MS reported a higher students per counselor than SPERRY MS (311.5:1 vs. 89.8:1).

Subgroup Analysis

Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.

12 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.

Contextual Indicators

District Context

District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.

Per-pupil spending
SPERRY MS
$10,413.51
CARVER MS
$11,872.78
Local revenue share
SPERRY MS
33%
CARVER MS
49.4%
State revenue share
SPERRY MS
54.6%
CARVER MS
29.1%
Federal revenue share
SPERRY MS
12.3%
CARVER MS
21.5%
District chronic absenteeism rate
SPERRY MS
29.6%
CARVER MS
56.5%

County Economics

Both schools are located in the same county.

Median household income
Tulsa County
$67,317
Tulsa County
$67,317
Poverty rate
Tulsa County
14.7%
Tulsa County
14.7%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Tulsa County
33.7%
Tulsa County
33.7%
Unemployment rate
Tulsa County
3.3%
Tulsa County
3.3%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.