- EUGENE FIELD ES reported a higher students per counselor than ROBERTSON ES (267:1 vs. 209:1).
- EUGENE FIELD ES reported a higher chronically absent students than ROBERTSON ES (158 vs. 123).
- ROBERTSON ES reported a higher gifted & talented than EUGENE FIELD ES (21 vs. 18).
- Source Data Limit: 4 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
EUGENE FIELD ES reported a higher chronically absent students than ROBERTSON ES (158 vs. 123).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
ROBERTSON ES reported a higher gifted & talented than EUGENE FIELD ES (21 vs. 18).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
EUGENE FIELD ES reported a higher students per counselor than ROBERTSON ES (267:1 vs. 209:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
18 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
EUGENE FIELD ES
$11,872.78
ROBERTSON ES
$11,872.78
Local revenue share
EUGENE FIELD ES
49.4%
ROBERTSON ES
49.4%
State revenue share
EUGENE FIELD ES
29.1%
ROBERTSON ES
29.1%
Federal revenue share
EUGENE FIELD ES
21.5%
ROBERTSON ES
21.5%
District chronic absenteeism rate
EUGENE FIELD ES
56.5%
ROBERTSON ES
56.5%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Tulsa County
$67,317
Tulsa County
$67,317
Poverty rate
Tulsa County
14.7%
Tulsa County
14.7%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Tulsa County
33.7%
Tulsa County
33.7%
Unemployment rate
Tulsa County
3.3%
Tulsa County
3.3%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.