- KERR ES reported a higher students per counselor than COOPER ES (403:1 vs. 229.6:1).
- COOPER ES reported a higher chronically absent students than KERR ES (217 vs. 200).
- COOPER ES reported a higher gifted & talented than KERR ES (31 vs. 24).
- Source Data Limit: 4 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
COOPER ES reported a higher chronically absent students than KERR ES (217 vs. 200).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
COOPER ES reported a higher gifted & talented than KERR ES (31 vs. 24).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
KERR ES reported a higher students per counselor than COOPER ES (403:1 vs. 229.6:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
20 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
COOPER ES
$11,872.78
KERR ES
$11,872.78
Local revenue share
COOPER ES
49.4%
KERR ES
49.4%
State revenue share
COOPER ES
29.1%
KERR ES
29.1%
Federal revenue share
COOPER ES
21.5%
KERR ES
21.5%
District chronic absenteeism rate
COOPER ES
56.5%
KERR ES
56.5%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Tulsa County
$67,317
Tulsa County
$67,317
Poverty rate
Tulsa County
14.7%
Tulsa County
14.7%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Tulsa County
33.7%
Tulsa County
33.7%
Unemployment rate
Tulsa County
3.3%
Tulsa County
3.3%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.