- PATRICK HENRY ES reported a higher chronically absent students than ELIOT ES (182 vs. 101).
- PATRICK HENRY ES reported a higher students per counselor than ELIOT ES (378:1 vs. 333.7:1).
- ELIOT ES reported a higher gifted & talented than PATRICK HENRY ES (60 vs. 54).
- Source Data Limit: 4 metrics are directly comparable between the two schools.
Attendance
How consistently students are present
PATRICK HENRY ES reported a higher chronically absent students than ELIOT ES (182 vs. 101).
Course Access & Programs
Advanced coursework and academic programs available
ELIOT ES reported a higher gifted & talented than PATRICK HENRY ES (60 vs. 54).
Staffing & Support
Counselor and support staff capacity
PATRICK HENRY ES reported a higher students per counselor than ELIOT ES (378:1 vs. 333.7:1).
Subgroup Analysis
Comparing reported values between specific student populations where both schools have data.
16 subgroup comparisons available across both schools.
Contextual Indicators
District Context
District-level data describes the overarching school district, not the individual school.
Per-pupil spending
ELIOT ES
$11,872.78
PATRICK HENRY ES
$11,872.78
Local revenue share
ELIOT ES
49.4%
PATRICK HENRY ES
49.4%
State revenue share
ELIOT ES
29.1%
PATRICK HENRY ES
29.1%
Federal revenue share
ELIOT ES
21.5%
PATRICK HENRY ES
21.5%
District chronic absenteeism rate
ELIOT ES
56.5%
PATRICK HENRY ES
56.5%
County Economics
Both schools are located in the same county.
Median household income
Tulsa County
$67,317
Tulsa County
$67,317
Poverty rate
Tulsa County
14.7%
Tulsa County
14.7%
Bachelor's degree or higher
Tulsa County
33.7%
Tulsa County
33.7%
Unemployment rate
Tulsa County
3.3%
Tulsa County
3.3%
This comparison is derived exclusively from publicly available federal and state datasets. It may not reflect the most current information. We encourage parents and families to supplement this data with information published directly on each school’s website, which may include more recent figures.